At issue: Whether the implementation plan for the NDC provides constitutionally required protection of the fundamental rights of the plaintiffs from the threat of climate change.
At issue: Whether the South Korean NDC provides constitutionally required protection of the fundamental rights of the plaintiffs from the threat of climate change.
At issue: Whether the climate law provides constitutionally required protection of the fundamental rights of the plaintiffs from the threat of climate change.
At issue: Whether the greenhouse gas emitting activities of New Zealand’s largest emitters amount to violations of common law duties under public nuisance, negligence, and a novel climate tort.
At issue: Whether Norway has violated the fundamental rights of Norwegian citizens and lower legislation through the adoption of three decisions concerning the plans for development and operation of petroleum (oil and gas) deposits in the North Sea by failing to include Scope 3 emissions in the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA).
At issue: Whether Kia Motors México could be sanctioned for non-compliance with the NOM-163-SEMARNAT-ENER-SCFI-2013, under the standards of the right to a healthy environment
At issue: Whether the defendant energy company has engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct in its public statements concerning its greenhouse gas emission policies
At issue: Negative human rights impacts of (expanding) fossil fuel activities by State-owned company Saudi Amraco, with support of major private financial institutions domiciled in Saudi Arabia, Japan, USA, UK and France.
At issue: Negative human rights impacts of (expanding) the Scarborough gas project and LNG facilities by Woodside Energy and BHP in Australia, especially on indigenous people’s rights due to damage to indigenous sacred art and songlines in Murujuga
At issue: France’s continued development of mega-basin projects in a context of climate change, and their impacts on the rights to environment, food and water, including the rights of smaller farmers.