United Kingdom
In the Matter of An Application by Brian Quinn and Michael Quinn (The High Court of Justice in Northern Ireland, 2013)
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Side A: Michael Quinn (Individual)
Side B: Commissioner Fitzsimmons of the Planning Appeals Commission (Government)
Core objectives: Seeking judicial review of a refusal to permit their request to develop a renewable energy wind-farm on their lands.
Summary
The applicants were brothers who owned lands in Northern Ireland. They sought judicial review of a Planning Commissioner's refusal to permit their request to develop a renewable energy wind-farm on their lands. The permit process was based on a balancing exercise weighing the wider environmental, economic and social benefits of a project against its adverse impact. The court accepted the brothers' assertion that the Commissioner's conduct of the test proceeded on a material mistake of fact. In particular, the Commissioner had failed to properly consider the environmental, economic and social benefits of the wind farm, including the importance of renewable energy generation to the UK meeting its greenhouse gas emissions targets.Case documents
from the Grantham Research Institute
from the Grantham Research Institute
