Shrestha v. Office of the Prime Minister et al.
Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
Principle law(s): Forests Act 12/2019,The Environment Protection Act 9/2019 (2076)
Side A: Padam Bahadur Shrestha (Individual)
Side B: Nepal (Government)
Core objectives: Seeking an order to compel the government of Nepal to enact an adequate climate change law
SummaryOn August 23, 2017 Padam Bahadur Shrestha filed an application to compel the government of Nepal to enact a new climate change law. When the authorities failed to respond, Shrestha petitioned the Supreme Court of Nepal to issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate order to enact such a law. According to the petition, the Environmental Protection Act of 1997 was inadequate because it did not address climate change, the Climate Change Policy of 2011 had not been implemented, and as a result, the humans and ecosystems of Nepal had experienced grave climate impacts. Shrestha alleged that the government’s failure to adequately address climate had violated the rights to a dignified life and a healthy environment guaranteed in the Constitution of Nepal, and violated Nepal’s commitments under the UNFCCC and the Paris Agreement.
Related laws and policies
The Forest act of 1993 provides a framework to ensure an operational management of the forestry sector, ensure the development, the conservation and the proper use of forest products. The act also provides the policies for a cooperation in the conservation and development of private forest by man...
This law was approved following the Shrestha v. Office of the Prime Minister et al. case mandating Nepal to take legislative action to be able to meet its commitments to the Paris Agreement.Chapter 4 set provisions related to climate change. Article 23 mandates the relevant ministry to periodical...