Climate Change Laws of the World will soon be upgraded to be AI powered, see full announcement
Brazil flag
Brazil

Fabiano Contarato, Randolph Rodrigues and Joenia Batista v. Ricardo Salles

Jurisdiction: Federal Supreme Court


Side A: Fabiano Contarato, Randolph Rodrigues and Joenia Batista (Government)


Side B: Ricardo Salles (Government)


Core objectives: Whether the Minister of the Environment committed high crimes and misdemeanors (crime de responsabilidade) by failing to implement policy that proactively achieves Brazil's targets for reducing GHGs in violation of Brazil's international commitments to combat climate change, in particular the Paris Agreement.


Summary
“Fabiano Contarato, Randolph Rodrigues e Joenia Batista vs. Ricardo Salles (Denúncia contra Ricardo Salles por crime de responsabilidade)”

On August 22, 2019, two congressmen, Fabiano Contarato and Randolph Rodrigues, and one congresswoman, Joenia Batista, filed a petition before the Federal Supreme Court to investigate political-administrative infractions leading to high crimes and misdemeanors (crime de responsabilidade) against Ricardo Salles, then-Minister of Environment of Brazil. The plaintiffs maintain that the public management of the defendant, as the head of the Ministry, was incompatible with the probity and decorum required of leaders in office. Among other decisions and omissions considered undignified, they allege the violation of international commitments ratified by the Brazilian government to combat climate change, in particular the Paris Agreement. They claim that the ministerial policy implemented by the defendant has not been proactive in achieving Brazil's targets for reducing Greenhouse Gases (GHGs). They affirm, in this sense, a lack of commitment to combating the illegal deforestation of the Amazon Rainforest. They also state that the budget of the Brazilian Institute for the Environment and Renewable Natural Resources (IBAMA) has been cut, compromising its environmental monitoring and enforcement activities. Finally, they request that the then-Minister of the Environment be recognized as having committed high crimes and misdemeanors (crime de responsabilidade) and that he be removed from office and disqualified from holding public office for eight years.

On October 24, 2019, Justice Edson Fachin held that the plaintiffs lacked legal standing and determined that the case should be dismissed. The plaintiffs then filed an Interlocutory Appeal in which they repeated the terms of the Petition, emphasizing that its legitimacy is supported by Article 14 of the Law of High Crimes and Misdemeanors (Lei dos Crimes de Responsabilidade – Law 1.079/1950), which allows any citizen to denounce a Minister of the State. In a subsequent decision from August 20, 2021, the Justice extinguished the case, ruling that the appeal had lost its grounds in view of the resignation of Ricardo Salles from the position of Minister of the Environment.

Case documents

from the Grantham Research Institute
from the Grantham Research Institute
Publication banner
Climate Change Laws of the World uses cookies to make the site simpler. Find out more about cookies >>